Shroud of turin carbon dating problems fordating com au
There is no evidence that neutron emission during an earthquake could alter the C-14 content of a shroud.
This, of course, could be tested in laboratory experiments, but the authors didn’t do it.3.
The second is the Gospel of Matthew, which also mentions an earthquake when Jesus died.
Needless to say, this is not independent evidence, and the other Gospels don’t mention such an earthquake. If it had happened, wouldn’t the Gospels have mentioned it?
But who could possibly think that that is independent evidence for an earthquake, since Dante wrote thirteen centuries after Jesus supposedly lived and, of course, based much of his opus on the Bible.
The authors, however, fail to cast any doubt on the credibility of their sources.2.
Although there is evidence that some earthquakes can transitorily release substantial amounts of neutrons into the atmosphere, there are three scientific problems with the authors’ hypothesis.1. D., and whose works mention Jesus as well as an earthquake and a solar eclipse that happened during the Crucifixion.
This evidence is not credible (there was no solar eclipse then), and Biblical scholars no longer accept Thallos’s quoted words as evidence for the historicity of Jesus.
Those neutrons were captured by nitrogen-14 to produce carbon-14, the parent material used in radiometric dating.It’s an attempt to refute scientific radiocarbon dating of the Shroud, which showed it to be a medieval forgery, by special pleading invoking earthquakes. You almost surely know that the Shroud of Turin is a sheet of linen that reposes behind closed doors in the Cathedral of St. And it bears the likeness of a man who is said to be Jesus.Indeed, the cloth is reputed to be the very burial shroud of Jesus.(This is in fact how carbon-14 is formed in the atmosphere.) But carbon-14 also decays back to nitrogen by emitting an electron.Carbon 12, the more common isotope of carbon, does not decay.